At Springer Nature, we believe that peer review is a cornerstone in developing high-quality content. We use both external peer review (consulting with experts in the field) and internal review (with in-house specialists). This guide explains the value that you bring as a peer reviewer, how peer review informs publishing decisions, and offers advice on how to write a constructive review.
Being a book peer reviewer is a fantastic opportunity to support the advancement of knowledge in your field and by guiding authors and editors in how to improve their publication.
Reviewing a book proposal is a different experience to reviewing a journal article. The type of content that you are sent to review can range from a proposal with a description of the proposed content and a provisional table of contents through to sample chapters or even a draft manuscript. When reviewing the content, you should be considering whether the book adequately covers the subject area, and whether the authors are targeting the right audience. The feedback that you give can help shape the final published book.
Protecting research integrity
Peer reviewers play a vital role in ensuring the content we publish is robust, ethical and free from misconduct, such as author manipulation or plagiarism.
Springer Nature is a member of the Committee on Publication Ethics (COPE) and follows the COPE guidelines on dealing with potential acts of misconduct. We ask peer reviewers to follow the principles of COPE's Ethical Guidelines for Peer-reviewers to safeguard research integrity.